TSTP Solution File: ITP166^1 by Lash---1.13
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Lash---1.13
% Problem : ITP166^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 04:02:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.44s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_int,type,
int: $tType ).
thf(ty_list_char,type,
list_char: $tType ).
thf(ty_produc1193801173ar_int,type,
produc1193801173ar_int: com > ( list_char > int ) > produc1260470173ar_int ).
thf(ty_p,type,
p: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).
thf(ty_c,type,
c: com ).
thf(ty_relati23543761ar_int,type,
relati23543761ar_int: ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > bexp > com > nat > ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).
thf(ty_bval,type,
bval: bexp > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).
thf(ty_suc,type,
suc: nat > nat ).
thf(ty_ka,type,
ka: nat ).
thf(ty_s_a,type,
s_a: list_char > int ).
thf(ty_big_big_step,type,
big_big_step: produc1260470173ar_int > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).
thf(ty_b,type,
b: bexp ).
thf(ty_c2,type,
c2: com ).
thf(ty_ta,type,
ta: list_char > int ).
thf(ty_sa,type,
sa: list_char > int ).
thf(ty_t_a,type,
t_a: list_char > int ).
thf(sP1,plain,
( sP1
<=> ( big_big_step @ ( produc1193801173ar_int @ c @ sa ) @ ta ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).
thf(sP2,plain,
( sP2
<=> ( ~ ( ( relati23543761ar_int @ p @ b @ c @ ( suc @ ka ) @ sa @ s_a )
=> ~ ( bval @ b @ sa ) )
=> ~ sP1 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).
thf(sP3,plain,
( sP3
<=> ( ( relati23543761ar_int @ p @ b @ c @ ( suc @ ka ) @ sa @ s_a )
=> ~ ( bval @ b @ sa ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).
thf(sP4,plain,
( sP4
<=> ! [X1: list_char > int,X2: list_char > int] :
( ~ ( ~ ( ( relati23543761ar_int @ p @ b @ c @ ( suc @ ka ) @ X1 @ X2 )
=> ~ ( bval @ b @ X1 ) )
=> ~ ( big_big_step @ ( produc1193801173ar_int @ c @ X1 ) @ ta ) )
=> ~ ( big_big_step @ ( produc1193801173ar_int @ c2 @ X2 ) @ t_a ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).
thf(sP5,plain,
( sP5
<=> ( ~ sP2
=> ~ ( big_big_step @ ( produc1193801173ar_int @ c2 @ s_a ) @ t_a ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).
thf(sP6,plain,
( sP6
<=> ( big_big_step @ ( produc1193801173ar_int @ c2 @ s_a ) @ t_a ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).
thf(sP7,plain,
( sP7
<=> ( bval @ b @ sa ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).
thf(sP8,plain,
( sP8
<=> ! [X1: list_char > int] :
( ~ ( ~ ( ( relati23543761ar_int @ p @ b @ c @ ( suc @ ka ) @ sa @ X1 )
=> ~ sP7 )
=> ~ sP1 )
=> ~ ( big_big_step @ ( produc1193801173ar_int @ c2 @ X1 ) @ t_a ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).
thf(sP9,plain,
( sP9
<=> ( relati23543761ar_int @ p @ b @ c @ ( suc @ ka ) @ sa @ s_a ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
~ sP4 ).
thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
sP4,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(1,plain,
( ~ sP3
| ~ sP9
| ~ sP7 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(2,plain,
( ~ sP2
| sP3
| ~ sP1 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(3,plain,
( ~ sP5
| sP2
| ~ sP6 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(4,plain,
( ~ sP8
| sP5 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(5,plain,
( ~ sP4
| sP8 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(fact_4_Suc_Oprems_I7_J,axiom,
sP9 ).
thf(fact_3_Suc_Oprems_I4_J,axiom,
sP6 ).
thf(fact_2_Suc_Oprems_I3_J,axiom,
sP1 ).
thf(fact_0_Suc_Oprems_I6_J,axiom,
sP7 ).
thf(6,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,h0,fact_4_Suc_Oprems_I7_J,fact_3_Suc_Oprems_I4_J,fact_2_Suc_Oprems_I3_J,fact_0_Suc_Oprems_I6_J]) ).
thf(0,theorem,
~ sP4,
inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[6,h0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : ITP166^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 16:53:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.44 % Mode: cade22sinegrackle2x6978
% 0.20/0.44 % Steps: 343
% 0.20/0.44 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------